Welcome to the Gallery – a place where you'll find hope and strength through the healing power of art and the universal reach of technology –
a place where you can
Connect, Create, and Thrive!
Interested in partnering with us?
Click here to find out how!
Displaying (4) Comments | Comment on this piece | Report objectionable art
TCO,1. No, it's not him. An interesting chaecatrr you're citing there. Keep searching.2. Since I answered no in #1, I guess this questions does not apply. (I can say that his criticism of that appeal to authenticity applies very well to the appeal to purity in conservatism 3. No, I have not read it. I don't believe I will, as management does not help me stay in a cheerful mood. So much fluff to justify making autocratic decisions 4. Your impression is right. I'll leave to you to evaluate my proficiency in english. All I can say is that it's better than my proficiency in german, spanish and swedish. Usually, when I get this kind of interview questions (how would you assess such and such), I have to fight a bit to stay cheerful.***For me, a post scriptum is still useful, for remarks that are somewhat unrelated to the topic of my comment. Also, I don't take that much time to write comments and usually revise once, then press the Submit button.PS: I might not be able to participate in the conversation until next monday evening. See? Old tricks used by latin scribes can still be useful!
By: | Sep 25, 2015 | Report Comment
It's good to see someone thinking it thrgouh.
By: | Feb 13, 2013 | Report Comment
beliefs. Further, the list of participants were caelrly not qualified to speak to uncertainty.All people out of the loop hear, the sound bite if you will, is that the skeptics extended an olive branch and are concerned about the science, but were rebutted by those cadre of main stream scientists who claim the science is settled. They then seduced a gullible journalist to print as much in a prominent science magazine. Goal achieved yet another myth created and yet another speaking point fabricated to rile the frothing mob of contrarians and denialists. Please don't fall for it.
By: | Dec 16, 2012 | Report Comment
The reconciliation ccfeernnoe organizers passed around, discussed, misquoted, and mischaracterized an e-mail from Gavin Schmidt declining their invitation, and it becomes the subject of a Judith Curry blog post that somehow has become symbolic (to JC and her followers) of the entirety of the so-called debate. Could there be any better evidence that Gavin's mistake was to have responded at all although this also, no doubt, would have been used as evidence against him and that reconciliation has nothing at all to do with the intentions of the organizers of the Lisbon ccfeernnoe? Reading Judith Curry's blog reminds me of the experience of , a survivor of the London underground train bombings in 2005.
By: | Dec 16, 2012 | Report Comment
refracting
margaretz
There are 34 pieces of art in this thread