Welcome to the Gallery – a place where you'll find hope and strength through the healing power of art and the universal reach of technology –
a place where you can
Connect, Create, and Thrive!
Interested in partnering with us?
Click here to find out how!
Displaying (2) Comments | Comment on this piece | Report objectionable art
hers does)- Completely new name I really like the symlobism of this beginning a new family together under a new name that is ours- Melded name an arrangement of our current names into one new name (again, the symlobism of it is nice), but this can look messy or odd.Those are the main ones I've talked about with him, but he doesn't like any of them. Initially I didn't like the idea of siblings with different last names, but that's the latest thing I'm pushing for since the other ideas were rejected the first kid can be FirstName MyLastAsAMiddle HisLast and the next kid can be FirstName HisLastAsAMiddle MyLast. I would probably add his name to mine in order to be connected in name with both children (and him), and he could do what he liked with his name, but I would hope that he'd add mine too.I haven't got an absolute no on that last suggestion, he said he'd go away and think about it before he told me how he felt Hopefully it satisfies his desire to pass on his name (even though I think it's a ridiculous concept), but it is still more fair than having everyone (except maybe me) with his last name.
By: | May 27, 2014 | Report Comment
read the blog . It has over a thousand posts and over a heundrd thousand comments. It's a NeverEndingAudit. A mess. If you like his side , then you excuse it. Well, I like his side but I don't like it. This stuff is actually not that tricky. But he just jerks around for years and years and never drives any issues through to a real point. The whole thing is just an excuse to get attaboys from hoi polloi or old retired warhorses.I'm fully aware that there are interesting issues in play and VERY OPEN to the possibility that Mike may not be doing the analyses most shrewdly. But guys like Von Storch/Zorita, Huybers, Smeardon, Christenson(sp?) are the ones who are clearly labeling the issues and running tests to look at them.McI is just a yuckyuck who doesn't even come to the point of making.,,points. He's not even wrong. And I say all of this, leaving open the possibility that he might be right that judgement of the MWP distinctiveness should only be done in the context of proaxies spanning the entire period (note, this is NOT the same problem as trying to draw the best recon over the entire period). But if so, make the case clearly. Show me some sort of logical hypothesis test style of thinking. Cite the literature or textbooks (it's really an argument on sampling versus hypothesis tests, can consider it independant of climate context).
By: | May 27, 2014 | Report Comment
NICKIN3D
nicks
There are 1 pieces of art in this thread