Welcome to the Gallery – a place where you'll find hope and strength through the healing power of art and the universal reach of technology –
a place where you can
Connect, Create, and Thrive!
Interested in partnering with us?
Click here to find out how!
Displaying (8) Comments | Comment on this piece | Report objectionable art
5sQHOp I will right away grab your rss as I can at find your e-mail subscription link or e-newsletter service. Do you ave any? Kindly let me know in order that I could subscribe. Thanks.
By: | Jun 25, 2019 | Report Comment
That's an apt answer to an inntteseirg question
By: | Oct 08, 2016 | Report Comment
Keep it coming, wrretis, this is good stuff.
By: | Aug 24, 2014 | Report Comment
Cu6ADa I loved your article post. Cool.
By: | Aug 05, 2014 | Report Comment
Oh My Goodness Cindy, how fantastic! Yakes, maybe I won't be able to sell my atwrork anymore, this is so wonderful. You are very lucky to have all these offers, you would die if you knew the price of getting something similar printed in AustraliaI'm heading over to have a closer look at what this company has to offer
By: | Feb 13, 2013 | Report Comment
Lucia at the Blackboard quotes a magsese O'Donnell sent her today. I've copied it all, including her comments at the beginning and end: lucia (Comment#69195)February 11th, 2011 at 2:40 pmbugs–We couldn’t see a copy of those emails, could we?This morning I wrote to Ryan asking a question I thought Rabett was addressing to me in his post. (Rabett used the word “Lucia”.) Ryan responded, and I would assume on that basis, added me to a list of people to whom he sent this;Everyone,I am going to take a break from this for awhile. I thank all of you for your kind worse, suggestions, and help. And just in case, while I’m gone, you get stuck in a corner, I will reprint below verbatim what I guaranteed to Eric. Revkin was copied on this as well:“I explicitly stated that part of my problem with Eric’s post is that he twice misrepresented the references and selectively used the portion of my response that fit his argument. However, since he was not given our third response, he is unarguably owed both a public correction and an apology with respect to this part of my post. In addition to this, based on the above, I do not feel that my public characterization of “duplicity” with respect to the iRidge criticism is supportable enough for me to stand on the sidelines while it travels around the internet, and this term (along with other uses of “dishonesty”) will be striken. While some of you may disagree, as I was the one who made the original accusation, I feel that I should be allowed to withdraw it. I request that everyone run the correction and apology (both of which I will supply).”I have apologized for exactly what I told him I would apologize for.I apologized in a stand-alone post exactly as I told him I would do.I have requested exactly the edits I told him I would request.RyanThis is my basis for believing that Ryan and Eric discussed this. I assume they discussed by email, though for all I know they discussed by phone, snail mail or what not.
By: | Sep 03, 2012 | Report Comment
L744Mn Not bad post, but a lot of extra !!....
By: | Feb 11, 2012 | Report Comment
WMZZeI Cool:) I would say say it exploded my brain..!!
By: | Feb 11, 2012 | Report Comment
Cosmic Forces
Imogen
There are 1 pieces of art in this thread