Welcome to the Gallery – a place where you'll find hope and strength through the healing power of art and the universal reach of technology –
a place where you can
Connect, Create, and Thrive!
Interested in partnering with us?
Click here to find out how!
Displaying (1) Comments | Comment on this piece | Report objectionable art
By :It's been an expensive loessn in the mixing of bad science and politics along with the creation and death of a quasi religion. I actually don't care which way it turns out, and will adjust accordingly, but I do want to see science return to a foundation of honest inquiry and truthfulness while rejecting political considerations/influence. A guy can dream, eh? ;-)Actually in science most of this is a non-issue in the sense that the overwhelming majority of scientists agree, not necessarily on the results but on the severity of the problem (see below). The dispute is created by incompetent, uneducated politicians and lobbyists. What do I mean with severity of the problem? The same models using different input parameters can lead to both, quite mild and absolutely devastating results. This is a basic feature of a complex nonlinear system in which chaos, multistability and other funky features are to be expected. Ignoring this is like giving your children a revolver with just one bullet loaded and telling them that it is save to play Russian roulette as the chance they will kill themselves is small. While no one would do this, somehow people think it is quite ok to not only endanger the livelyhood of their children but to also make their lives harder with their own greed. Rate this comment: 0 0
By: | Aug 05, 2012 | Report Comment
Feb_03_no_3a
mzabor
There are 365 pieces of art in this thread