Welcome to the Gallery – a place where you'll find hope and strength through the healing power of art and the universal reach of technology –
a place where you can
Connect, Create, and Thrive!
Interested in partnering with us?
Click here to find out how!
Displaying (5) Comments | Comment on this piece | Report objectionable art
Jack McLaughlin:Spanier and others who etxoeraned him are now either fired or under indictment.Ron Cram:He [McIntyre] is comparing the lack of investigation of each by the university. Oh, really? Mann was etxoeraned by an inquiry panel and an investigation panel (for the vaguer, more general misconduct allegation). None of these panel members have been fired or are under indictment. McIntyre's piece was nothing more than a deeply offensive attempt to smear an inquiry into unfounded, politically-motivated accusations of research misconduct, by equating that inquiry/investigation with a completely unrelated coverup of sexual abuse. And by the way, the National Science Foundation did an independent review of the PSU procceedings, and also etxoeraned Mann of the specific misconduct allegations, finding no credible evidence to support them. Somehow, McIntyre omitted that fact when he recently reiterated his long ago complaint of so-called procedural errors in the Mann inquiry:[Y]ou’d have thought that the university would have obtained the best possible professional advice on how to handle an inquiry and investigation from the Office of Research Integrity (or their equivalent at NSF). [Emphasis added].
By: | Jul 21, 2012 | Report Comment
Trying to destroy Michael Mann won’t cganhe that .These people aren'r dealing with science Jim, they're attacking symbols.And Mann's instantly recognisable (even to laymen) hockey stick totem is heap big magic. That's why they must destroy it. Or him. McinTyres will go, Ahab-like, to his grave in the attempt.[DC: edited].But all to no avail, as you rightly point out.
By: | Jul 09, 2012 | Report Comment
I am at a conference and chcaigo for IPA. It is informative but some issues are fishy. The billing area is very complex. You really cannot give the customer a total for counseling. Granted it depends on the size of the business and if the gross income in over 800,000 a year. Contracts with smaller companies are really not focused on or followed up. The higher the income the more is charged for the counseling. It has been two days and the information is common but confusing at the same time. It really involves many ways to approach the client and get them interested in the program right away. The Cards do not have a phone# or Email address of the rep! We cannot give our cell phone out to the client. A No-no. I will upgrade this information at the end of the day. I have to return to the seminar. I will upgrade this posting tonight
By: | Apr 29, 2012 | Report Comment
lacRVZ Thank you, a very interesting note!!....
By: | Feb 11, 2012 | Report Comment
Great stuff, you hleepd me out so much!
By: | Dec 13, 2011 | Report Comment
where_the_birds_go
Rowan & Rosalind
There are 2 pieces of art in this thread