Welcome to the Gallery – a place where you'll find hope and strength through the healing power of art and the universal reach of technology –
a place where you can
Connect, Create, and Thrive!
Interested in partnering with us?
Click here to find out how!
Displaying (3) Comments | Comment on this piece | Report objectionable art
I think one of the initial rseeaels also used we . Anyway, it was pretty obvious the various versions of insider theory never held any water. Besides, Fred Pearce gave it some credence, a sure indicator that it was wrong (as I recall, a fellow Guardian correspondent even felt compelled to correct that particular canard).It's even more obvious now, but it always seemed to me that the material was stolen, and then keyword searches applied offline. It would make more sense that different people would do those tasks. The apparently different locations of README writer and the initial archivist tends to confirm that.
By: | Dec 16, 2012 | Report Comment
Unparalleled accuracy, unequivocal clarity, and unedinalbe importance!
By: | Dec 13, 2011 | Report Comment
You're a real deep thinker. Thanks for shranig.
By: | Jul 21, 2011 | Report Comment
black_clouds
margaretz
There are 15 pieces of art in this thread