Welcome to the Gallery – a place where you'll find hope and strength through the healing power of art and the universal reach of technology –
a place where you can
Connect, Create, and Thrive!
Interested in partnering with us?
Click here to find out how!
Displaying (1) Comments | Comment on this piece | Report objectionable art
I take your point that the NSF conducted its own inigotieatvsn de novo. But they also explicitly conducted a review of the Penn State proceedings.The NSF OIG did find that Penn State should have gone further in their inquiry of the misconduct allegation, specifically by inviting critics to supply information that could support the allegation. However, this implied criticism does not extend to McIntyre's specific procedural criticism (i.e. whether there was enough evidence for the allegation to go to the inigotieatvsn stage).In fact, after numerous interviews, the NSF came to the conclusion that there was no such evidence, As part of our inigotieatvsn, we attempted to determine if data fabrication or falsification may haveoccurred and interviewed the subject, critics, and disciplinary experts in coming to our conclusions. Asa result of our interviews we concluded: 4. There is no specific evidence that the Subject falsified or fabricated any data and no evidencethat his actions amounted to research misconduct. [Emphasis added] Not a lack of a preponderance of evidence necessary for a misconduct finding nor even weak evidence. There was no evidence whatsoever.This raises another question that I have often wondered about. It seems inconceivable that Steve McIntyre would not have been one of the critics contacted. Sure enough, it turns out that McIntyre di2d40d discuss his interview with the NSF (in a) in September of this year.I was one of the people interviewed by the NSF Inspector General. However, I might as well not have been interviewed as the report makes no mention of the issues that we discussed at our meeting. More on this another post [sic].McIntyre appears not to have gotten around to that post yet. But one can only presume that the NSF was less than impressed with McIntyre's issues . It is reasonable to infer that the NSF did review McIntyre's incoherent baseless accusations regarding hide the decline and withholding adverse findings . And found that there was no evidence of scientific misconduct at all.BTW, here is a (at ThinkProgress).
By: | Mar 13, 2014 | Report Comment
hipmadieze
colea | Region 4
it will make your eyes spin
There are 1 pieces of art in this thread