Welcome to the Gallery – a place where you'll find hope and strength through the healing power of art and the universal reach of technology –
a place where you can
Connect, Create, and Thrive!
Interested in partnering with us?
Click here to find out how!
Displaying (10) Comments | Comment on this piece | Report objectionable art
I love you just the way you are.... it's a song, but so fitting here. Love your super mega talent just the way it is and the cute stories about your neices and nephews. Keep it comn!githis layout is so fabulous, love the paper and the great design. The pics are so cute.
By: | Dec 26, 2016 | Report Comment
I bow down humbly in the presence of such grsesnate.
By: | Oct 08, 2016 | Report Comment
I've been lokiong for a post like this forever (and a day)
By: | Oct 23, 2015 | Report Comment
Your post has moved the debate fordarw. Thanks for sharing!
By: | Oct 11, 2015 | Report Comment
Well I guess I don't have to spend the weekend figrniug this one out!
By: | Sep 25, 2015 | Report Comment
Deadly accurate answer. You've hit the bullyese!
By: | Jul 08, 2015 | Report Comment
That's a smart way of looikng at the world.
By: | Jan 02, 2015 | Report Comment
Does anyone know what hppneas to negative home equity situations during divorces in Washington state these days? I keep hearing of how negative equity is complicating divorces, but I don't really understand the nuts and bolts of it.Do the divorcing parties have to split the negative equity down the middle? Is it apportioned based on what percentage of ownership each party is considered to have (i.e. who made the down-payment, the percentage of the mortgage payments each party covered)?What about the case where one party really didn't make any financial contribution (e.g. a home-maker)? Would that party be saddled with substantial negative equity debts (owed to their ex) if their over-all asset situation was in a significant under-water situation?For the record, I am renting (as most people on this site already know), so this certainly isn't something that concerns me directly. It is just something I have been wondering about as I continue to see larger numbers of homes go under-water. Rate this comment: 0 0
By: | Aug 12, 2014 | Report Comment
RE: It's hard to say what may make it and what won't- every tax has it's related itrneest group. I think we may see the mortgage deduction reduced to $300-500K. Do $1M+ home buyers really need a deduction? But I have no doubt taxes will be going up- we have to pay that itrneest on the debt one way or another.I'm in favor of a flat tax, say 5% of the first $50K and 20% everything over that with no deductions. I think it's important that everyone pay something, if only to keep them itrneested in how the money is being spent, and give them some skin in the game. After that, a flat tax with no exclusions/deductions offers the fewest long term distortions for the economy as a whole. Rate this comment: 0 0
By: | May 27, 2014 | Report Comment
By :RE: I'm with you on this one patient. I ralrey see anything pfft posts convincing me differently about the economy. I do however like seeing his posts as they generate great responses from SWE and Scotsman, usually with links. I appreciate the discussions between this group as the links they share help me draw my own informed decisions about the economy. I don't tend to be quite as bearish as SWE and Scotsman, etc but I definitely have become more bearish because of the discussions on this board.there are literally 20 economic indicators that I could show you that show recovery. it doesn't mean the economy is perfect or that we aren't heading towards the next bubble. things are getting better even though right now we are slowing a little.at one point we were losing 500,000 plus jobs a month. now we are adding jobs. how is that not progress? it may not be perfect but it's progress. Rate this comment: 0 0
By: | Mar 12, 2014 | Report Comment
111111
kimmes | Region 4
There are 6 pieces of art in this thread